Categories
Terrorism Uncategorized

Fifteen years of Terror?

The United Kingdom’s newly minted Under-Secretary for Security, Counter-terrorism and Police Sir Alan West has said that we face a battle that could take up to 15 years to deal with radicalisation in the fight against terrorism.

In his first interview since his surprise appointment by Gordon Brown as security minister, Sir Alan called on people to be “a little bit un-British” and even inform on each other in an attempt to trap those plotting to take innocent lives.

“Britishness does not normally involve snitching or talking about someone,” he said. “I’m afraid, in this situation, anyone who’s got any information should say something because the people we are talking about are trying to destroy our entire way of life.”

He said he was determined to build on the Government’s core anti-terrorism strategy of the “four Ps” – prepare, protect, pursue, prevent – but that the “prevent” side, dealing with the radicalisation of young Muslims, was the most important.

I’m not sure his idea about snitching is such a good one though. It would indeed be helpful if people that actually had important information concerning a terrorist threat would come forward, but a society of snitches is going to create an overwhelming number of false positives. The police don’t have the manpower to deal with every nosy neighbour that suspects the darkly skinned man from down the road who because he keeps himself to himself is up to no good.

The admiral, who has been given a far-reaching brief across all government departments, also launched an attack on the phrase “war on terror” – which has been abandoned by ministers since Mr Blair left office.

He said: “I hate that expression. When I first heard it – I think it came over from the States – I though it was totally the wrong thing. It’s not like a war in that sense at all. It demeans the value of a war and it demeans the value of a lot of things.

“I don’t like the fact that we talk about ‘the Muslim community’ and this sort of thing. I have a lot of Muslim friends and they see themselves as British. We’ve got to be very careful. The threat is to our British way of life and all of our British people.”

Of the terrorists, he said: “I think they have severely damaged one of the world’s great religions – the one they purport to support.” The claims that British foreign policy was solely to blame was an erroneous argument, he said.

I do agree with his opinions on the expressions ‘War on Terror’ and ‘the Muslim community’. The use of the former in my opinion actually aids the enemy by giving the impression that the West sees this as a clash of civilisations with the Islamic world and supports the al Qaeda propaganda that the West is trying to destroy Islam.

The latter isn’t really helpful either as their isn’t really any such thing as ‘the Muslim community’. There are many Muslim communities within the UK but they don’t necessarily share a common viewpoint and any Muslim leader does not speak for all British Muslims.

Categories
Terrorism Uncategorized

Why Terrorism Doesn’t Work

Why Terrorism Doesn’t Work [via]

Interesting essay that posits the theory that terrorists that predominately attack civilian targets fail to achieve any of their aims because the general public the media and the governments misconstrue their aims as being solely to kill civilians when in fact they seek some political aim that is overlooked.

Means to an end not an end in and of itself.

Categories
Politics Security Terrorism Uncategorized

UK Terrorism Minister

Admiral Sir Alan West has been appointed to the newly created Home Office post of Under-Secretary for Security, Counter-terrorism and Police of the United Kingdom.

The former First Sea Lord and Chief of the Naval Staff will need to be made a Life Peer in order for him to serve as a Minister in Gordon Brown’s government.

I’m bothered that we now have a former senior military officer in a post as a Government Minister without him ever having to be elected by the voters. He will however have a great deal more experience in matters of security to call on than his colleagues at the Home Office.

Categories
Security Terrorism Uncategorized

Seven British Al-Qaeda members jailed

BBC News: Al-Qaeda cell members imprisoned

Seven men have been jailed for up to 26 years over an al-Qaeda-linked plot to kill thousands in the UK and US.

Woolwich Crown Court heard they were in a “sleeper cell” led by Dhiren Barot, who is already serving a life sentence.

Barot planned attacks including an explosives-packed limousine, a dirty radiation bomb and blowing apart a London Underground tunnel.

Six admitted conspiracy to cause explosions and a seventh was found guilty of conspiracy to murder.

A rare piece of good news in the so called War on Terror with the police and presumably the Security Service, although they are not mentioned in the BBC article, preventing a cell of terrorists from carrying out an attack.

Deputy Assistant Commissioner Peter Clarke, head of the Metropolitan Police’s Counter Terrorism Command, said

“The plans for a series of co-ordinated attacks in the United Kingdom included packing three limousines with gas cylinders and explosives before setting them off in underground car parks. This could have caused huge loss of life.

“The plans to set off a dirty bomb in this country would have caused fear, panic and widespread disruption.”

I’m always wary when I hear that plots involving dirty radiation bombs have been foiled because the use of the term “dirty bomb” seems to be a preferred method of the government’s for terrifying the British public when in fact the reality of the danger of such devices is far outweighed by the perceived danger.

This goes back to what I was saying yesterday about Walter Mitty like terrorist wannabes with outlandish unfeasible plots. Whilst in theory a “dirty bomb” is relatively simple to construct the construction and deployment of such a device in a manner that could kill a great number of people is a whole different ball game.

However in this case if the BBC article is accurate then the terrorist cell contained a wide range of skills and apparently enough expertise to carry out a devastating attack using conventional methods without the need for the movie plot device of a “dirty bomb”.

In the trial of Dhiren Barot, the ringleader of this cell, an expert testified that if the radiation (dirty bomb) project had been carried out, it would have been unlikely to cause deaths, but was designed to affect about 500 people.

Categories
Security Terrorism Uncategorized

Terrorist or idiot?

Bruce Schneier has written an excellent piece on how the actual dangers posed by terrorist plots often differs widely from the dangers portrayed by the media and governments, it is titled Portrait of the Modern Terrorist as an Idiot.

The recently publicized terrorist plot to blow up John F. Kennedy International Airport, like so many of the terrorist plots over the past few years, is a study in alarmism and incompetence: on the part of the terrorists, our government and the press.

Terrorism is a real threat, and one that needs to be addressed by appropriate means. But allowing ourselves to be terrorized by wannabe terrorists and unrealistic plots — and worse, allowing our essential freedoms to be lost by using them as an excuse — is wrong.

These wannabe terrorists are often pathetic Walter Mitty type characters whose fantasies of martyrdom are undermined by their utter of competence and ability to carry out their ridiculous plots. The case of Russell Defreitas and his plot to blow up JFK airport is a good example.

It’s a plot straight from the disaster movie genre. Destroy New York’s major airport, its terminals, and even parts of the borough of Brooklyn in one dastardly explosion.

Unfortunately for the alleged plotters, the real life Jack Bauers (of 24 fame) were ahead of the ticking bomb. Not only was the idea outlandish and highly unlikely to succeed, but authorities have been recording the conversations of the plotters for the past 18 months.

– Did these men pose a threat? Undoubtedly.
– Could they have blown up JFK airport? It’s doubtful and in any case they were barely into the planning stage of the attack and had been under surveillance for a long time so whatever threat they posed could never be realised.

Categories
Politics Terrorism Uncategorized

Enhanced interrogation techniques: Fetch the comfy chair!

Categories
Movies Reviews Surveillance

Review: Taking Liberties

Taking Liberties

Most important UK documentary of the decade? Perhaps. Whilst it is not as well made as the Adam Curtis documentary The Power of Nightmares it is very powerful and has a hell of an impact. I only wish more people would see it, but I have a feeling that it will only end up preaching to the converted as those in the know are the only ones that will go to see it.

However if it inspires anyone and moves them to action then perhaps it be said to have succeeded. It made me rethink my decision no to join the march against the War in Iraq, I knew at the time that the government was committed to war and would not be swayed in that by any number of marchers but perhaps I should have stood up to be counted amongst those opposed.

Categories
Reviews Security Terrorism TV

24: CTU security

Is it just me or does CTU LA seem to be the least secure Counter Terrorist facility on the planet. I’ve lost track now of how many times it has been successfully infiltrated or attacked it seems to have at least once a season if not more.

Hour 21 of Season 6 and it has happened again and been taken over by Chinese agents. Poor foolish Milo. This would never have happened had Bill Buchanan been left in charge!

Categories
Surveillance Uncategorized

Fingerprinting children

Britain, a nation that has sleepwalked into a surveillance state is considering a proposal to fingerprint children aged 11-15.

This is to tackle the danger posed by teenagers that might otherwise be able to avoid the all-seeing eye of the British Surveillance Society because they will have child passports free from biometric details. [via]

Categories
Security Uncategorized

Iris scam. Iris scan

Iridology may be bogus science, but it appears that the eyes really could windows to the soul as Swedish researchers reveal it may be possible to read a person’s personality from their irises.