Categories
Security Uncategorized

Of Peanuts and Pedophiles – An analogy for stranger danger

Excellent post over at the Free Range Kids blog which draws a great analogy for stranger danger with a possible treatment for peanut allergies.

By administering first a dust-size speck of peanuts to an allergic child, and then a slightly larger speck and so on and so on, you can sometimes train the child’s immunological system to stop violently overreacting. It is wonderful to think that for some people, this may be a cure at last. But it’s also wonderful to think of the peanut story as an analogy to, of all things, stranger danger.

If a child is allowed to explore the world – a little at first, under loving surveillance, but more and more as the years go by — that child’s chances of overreacting to small, everyday risks diminishes. The child is gradually developing street smarts.

They go on to talk about the overreaction by a mother in a waiting room when her son approached an old lady to see what she was doing with her magnifying glass she had to help her read the paper. Swooping in to carry her child away from the old lady the mother said “He’s got to learn early NOT to talk to strangers.”

Security guru Bruce Schneier has a great essay along similar lines title The Kindness of Strangers

When I was growing up, children were commonly taught: “don’t talk to strangers.” Strangers might be bad, we were told, so it’s prudent to steer clear of them.

And yet most people are honest, kind, and generous, especially when someone asks them for help. If a small child is in trouble, the smartest thing he can do is find a nice-looking stranger and talk to him.

These two pieces of advice may seem to contradict each other, but they don’t. The difference is that in the second instance, the child is choosing which stranger to talk to. Given that the overwhelming majority of people will help, the child is likely to get help if he chooses a random stranger. But if a stranger comes up to a child and talks to him or her, it’s not a random choice. It’s more likely, although still unlikely, that the stranger is up to no good.

By exposing children to strangers in a safe way you can teach them to recognise the difference to put it simply between the behaviours of good strangers and bad strangers. Teaching them to fear everybody will only hinder them in the future and could lead them to worse danger should they ever get lost or separated from their parents.

Categories
Computing Security

Phishing Scams in Plain English – Video from Common Craft

Categories
Reviews TV

Review – Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles 2.21 – Adam Raised a Cain

Season 2 is coming to an end with one hell of a spate of excellent episodes and with each one John loses someone significant. This week it was the turn of Derek whose death was one of the most brutally short and unsympathetic deaths of a major character on television (outside of HBO dramas anyway). It was however very fitting for the show as the very premise of the show is the brutal struggle to prevent or ensure the virtual annihilation of the human race by the machines.

Weaver seems to confirm that which has been suspected for a while that John Henry is in fact not destined to become Skynet but that humanity’s survival depends on his survival. The third faction that we saw in the future may be established here and now through Weaver and John Henry, working against Skynet but not with the humans. It may be that humanity’s survival is too important to be left in the hands of human beings (they will disappoint you).

The little girl that plays Savannah is wonderful, she has a great rapport with Garrett Dillahunt as John Henry. Donald, where’s your trousers? has never been so haunting as it was here.

Derek’s death and Sarah’s subsequent arrest might just be the final push needed to transform John into the John Connor that is capable of saving the human race and leading the resistance against Skynet.

Categories
Uncategorized

Sorry, we didn’t agree to that. Keira Knightley in anti-domestic violence ad

I knew what was coming but I was still quite shocked by this advert. Very powerful stuff that should work well at raising awareness and eliciting donations to Women’s Aid.

Sorry, we didn’t agree to that. That wasn’t in the script.

I think that the dialogue is pretty clever as it is working on two levels there victims of domestic violence never signed up for that when they started the relationship, it wasn’t in their script.

A friend of mine commented on it.

The ad is disturbing, but does it actually work as a message against domestic violence? I suspect a few will see it as wish fulfilment porn, while the rest of us will just be upset by it. Does it do anything more than temporarily draw attention?

I couldn’t imagine anyone who might dislike Keira Knightley would actually get off on it once they saw it.

But yes after a little searching I was unfortunately proved wrong as shown in this bunch of comments at The Onion’s AV Club which usually is pretty good source of intelligent commentary.

Some better discussions are going on at Feministing and Metafilter.

I think that a number of people are missing the point of the purpose of the advert though. I think it has primarily been designed to temporarily draw attention, start discussion and get people to donate to Women’s Aid. It was not designed to give the message that “it is never too soon to leave an abusive relationship. There are places for you to go”. Tackling domestic violence needs a multi-pronged approach and hopefully this advert will raise awareness and funds to enable another longer term low key campaign that will give practical advice to help women in these situations get out of them.

Categories
Copyright Uncategorized

Movie industry adopts a softer approach in the fight against piracy

You wouldn’t steal a car. You wouldn’t steal a DVD. Piracy is theft.

The anti-piracy ads that were so wonderfully spoofed by the sitcom The IT Crowd will now be replaced by a softer message thanking viewers for supporting the industry in a series of ads spoofing classic films such as Jaws, Life of Brian and Lord of the Rings.

The ads, part of an anti-piracy campaign called “You Make the Movies”, mark a shift by film and TV content owners from a “stick” to a “carrot” strategy in marketing their message about copyright infringement.

Categories
Reviews TV

Lost 5.11 – Whatever Happened, Happened

Roger Linus is not quite the abusive douchebag we’ve been led to believe he was, he is genuinely very concerned about Ben when he sees Jin bring him back suffering from the gunshot wound inflicted by Sayid. Roger is remorseful about how poor a father he’s been.

Cassidy has an interesting interpretation of Sawyer’s sacrificial leap from the helicopter. He did it because he’s a coward.

Miles and Hurley’s conversation is very meta and explains how we are supposed to believe time travel works on the show i.e. not like Back to the Future, you can’t change your future by changing the past. Which presumably means that Ben cannot die and Sayid’s attempted homicide was futile.

Jack refusal to help save Ben is because he’s come to realise that perhaps he was getting in the way of what the island wants. But Kate even after all that Ben had done to her does everything within her power to save the life of younng Ben.

Odd that when Sayid was torturing Ben in the Swan station that Ben didn’t recognise him as being the same guy he helped escape from the Dharma initiative and subsequently shot him.

Juliet makes the suggestion to Kate that maybe the Others can do something to save Ben and in her expression there seems to be some realisation that of course all these events were meant to happen as it is this that leads Ben to eventually join the Others.